On July 16, 2009, the Minnesota Supreme Court ruled in favor of the firm’s clients in an important case involving the ability of insurance policy holders to assign their insurance benefits for broken auto glass to the company that performs the replacement services. The Supreme Court’s decision reverses two Minnesota Court of Appeals decisions that […]

On August 25, 2009, the Connecticut Supreme Court ruled in favor of the firm’s clients in a case involving an effort by insurance companies to limit their obligations to pay automobile glass claims such that the insurers are able to pay less than what their policies require them to pay. The Supreme Court’s decision reverses […]